Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search
Latest topics
December 2016
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Calendar Calendar

Statistics
We have 862 registered users
The newest registered user is oshe

Our users have posted a total of 1208 messages in 336 subjects
Who is online?
In total there are 5 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 5 Guests :: 1 Bot

None

[ View the whole list ]


Most users ever online was 32 on Fri Mar 08, 2013 10:22 pm

Procurement Supplement on Daily News-Comment!

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: Procurement Supplement on Daily News-Comment!

Post  RSM on Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:21 am

GedielCM

Thumbs up!!! Your comment is absolutely correct.

You seem to be a closer follower of procurement matters both through TPJ Supplements and the Forum. Tanzania needs only 50 people of your kind to revolutionalisze public procurement- People who are keen in reading and offering, comments, suggestions, critisms etc.

Keep it up for TPJ Supplement and Tanzania Public Procurement Forum (TPPF) funs.

RSM

Posts : 150
Join date : 2009-08-11

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Procurement Supplement on Daily News-Comment!

Post  GadielCM on Thu Dec 17, 2009 4:10 pm

To whom it may Concern!
I am refering to the Supplement No. 23 on December 8th, 2009, procurement supplement in Daily Newspaper Volume II-No. 12. For benefit of other readers, there is wrong citation made for limits of value applied when you want to select procurement method using the Second Schedule of G.N 97 OF PPA 2004. Before my comment, read the following part of that paragraph on the issue of '' Emergence Procurement needs informed decisions by Procuring Entity''.

The paragraph says-[i]''In its current form part of the Regulation 42 reads as follows:-
The correct interpretation here is that the Head of PE is given full mandate to proceed with emergency procurement if he/she can justify that it is a real emergency and in the public interest. The limits of authority are those in the First and Second Schedules to the Regulations. The First Schedule limits his/her authority with regard to value of a single contract and the total value of all contracts so procured per annum. The Second Schedule sets a limit to the value of contract procured through a particular method, for example, Tshs 800 million if goods are procured using a single source method.[/i].

The correct comment here for the last sentence should be that '' The Second Schedule sets a limit to the value of contract procured through a particular method, for example Tshs 800 million if WORKS ARE PROCURED USING SINGLE SOURCE METHOD. This is the correct intrepretation from the said schedule. And if the Author intended to use procurement of GOODS, he/she should say Tshs 500 million if GOODS are procured using single source method. Please observe that for benefit of other readers.

GadielCM

Posts : 69
Join date : 2009-08-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum