December 2017

Calendar Calendar

We have 918 registered users
The newest registered user is Jamestone

Our users have posted a total of 1218 messages in 343 subjects
Who is online?
In total there are 6 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 6 Guests


[ View the whole list ]

Most users ever online was 37 on Mon Sep 04, 2017 5:41 pm

Section 59 (2) (a) of the act 2011

View previous topic View next topic Go down

SECTION 59 (2) (A) OF THE ACT 2011

Post  freddy.mbeyella on Thu Jun 12, 2014 9:04 pm


Indeed. Justification of effective competition in procurement is a challenge. It requires knowledge or strategy in detecting bid rigging. However, there are some indicators which can assist you in detecting if there is lack of competition such as suspicious pricing patterns (e.g. the difference of prices among bidders very marginal) similarities in documents submitted, suspicious s behavior by firms etc.


Posts : 74
Join date : 2009-08-25

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Section 59 (2) (a) of the act 2011

Post  thanksme on Thu Jun 12, 2014 8:07 pm

with regard to section 59 (3), in tendering process how can I justify that there is lack of effective competition; S.59(2)(a).

Posts : 18
Join date : 2012-04-18
Age : 37
Location : Dar Es Salaam

View user profile

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum