Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search
April 2017
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Calendar Calendar

Statistics
We have 884 registered users
The newest registered user is teddy mtaty

Our users have posted a total of 1213 messages in 339 subjects
Who is online?
In total there are 6 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 6 Guests :: 1 Bot

None

[ View the whole list ]


Most users ever online was 33 on Wed Jan 25, 2017 6:48 pm

Section 59 (2) (a) of the act 2011

View previous topic View next topic Go down

SECTION 59 (2) (A) OF THE ACT 2011

Post  freddy.mbeyella on Thu Jun 12, 2014 9:04 pm

Thanksme,

Indeed. Justification of effective competition in procurement is a challenge. It requires knowledge or strategy in detecting bid rigging. However, there are some indicators which can assist you in detecting if there is lack of competition such as suspicious pricing patterns (e.g. the difference of prices among bidders very marginal) similarities in documents submitted, suspicious s behavior by firms etc.

freddy.mbeyella

Posts : 74
Join date : 2009-08-25

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Section 59 (2) (a) of the act 2011

Post  thanksme on Thu Jun 12, 2014 8:07 pm

with regard to section 59 (3), in tendering process how can I justify that there is lack of effective competition; S.59(2)(a).
avatar
thanksme

Posts : 18
Join date : 2012-04-18
Age : 37
Location : Dar Es Salaam

View user profile

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum