Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search
January 2019
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Calendar Calendar

Statistics
We have 959 registered users
The newest registered user is Mfaume.Bodde

Our users have posted a total of 1232 messages in 347 subjects
Who is online?
In total there are 4 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 4 Guests :: 2 Bots

None

[ View the whole list ]


Most users ever online was 49 on Fri Jul 06, 2018 7:06 am

Section 59 (2) (a) of the act 2011

Go down

SECTION 59 (2) (A) OF THE ACT 2011

Post  freddy.mbeyella on Thu Jun 12, 2014 9:04 pm

Thanksme,

Indeed. Justification of effective competition in procurement is a challenge. It requires knowledge or strategy in detecting bid rigging. However, there are some indicators which can assist you in detecting if there is lack of competition such as suspicious pricing patterns (e.g. the difference of prices among bidders very marginal) similarities in documents submitted, suspicious s behavior by firms etc.

freddy.mbeyella

Posts : 74
Join date : 2009-08-25

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Section 59 (2) (a) of the act 2011

Post  thanksme on Thu Jun 12, 2014 8:07 pm

with regard to section 59 (3), in tendering process how can I justify that there is lack of effective competition; S.59(2)(a).
avatar
thanksme

Posts : 19
Join date : 2012-04-18
Age : 39
Location : Dar Es Salaam

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum