Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search
July 2018
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Calendar Calendar

Statistics
We have 942 registered users
The newest registered user is Elieneza Mgonja

Our users have posted a total of 1229 messages in 346 subjects
Who is online?
In total there are 5 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 5 Guests :: 1 Bot

None

[ View the whole list ]


Most users ever online was 49 on Fri Jul 06, 2018 7:06 am

Section 59 (2) (a) of the act 2011

Go down

SECTION 59 (2) (A) OF THE ACT 2011

Post  freddy.mbeyella on Thu Jun 12, 2014 9:04 pm

Thanksme,

Indeed. Justification of effective competition in procurement is a challenge. It requires knowledge or strategy in detecting bid rigging. However, there are some indicators which can assist you in detecting if there is lack of competition such as suspicious pricing patterns (e.g. the difference of prices among bidders very marginal) similarities in documents submitted, suspicious s behavior by firms etc.

freddy.mbeyella

Posts : 74
Join date : 2009-08-25

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Section 59 (2) (a) of the act 2011

Post  thanksme on Thu Jun 12, 2014 8:07 pm

with regard to section 59 (3), in tendering process how can I justify that there is lack of effective competition; S.59(2)(a).
avatar
thanksme

Posts : 18
Join date : 2012-04-18
Age : 38
Location : Dar Es Salaam

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum