Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search
Latest topics
December 2016
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Calendar Calendar

Statistics
We have 862 registered users
The newest registered user is oshe

Our users have posted a total of 1208 messages in 336 subjects
Who is online?
In total there are 3 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 3 Guests

None

[ View the whole list ]


Most users ever online was 32 on Fri Mar 08, 2013 10:22 pm

BID SECURITY

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: BID SECURITY

Post  Rutaihwa on Tue Feb 07, 2012 4:21 pm

To my observation the tender should be rejected under the following ground

Reg 90 (4) the bidder is inconsistent with the terms & Conditions set forth in tender document.

Reg 90 (6) NONE avilability of required guarantee,tender not generally in order.

Reg 90 (9) Tender not accompanied by an acceptable tender guarantee, and Rg 90 (10)/GN No.97 of 2005 of the PPA 2004

GadielCM wrote:RJM,
The evaluation commitee should use Rg 90 (10)/GN No.97 of 2005 of the PPA 2004 to reach consensus.

Rutaihwa

Posts : 58
Join date : 2011-09-29
Age : 49

View user profile

Back to top Go down

KASAMBALA DISTRICT Vs KAMBALU BIDDER NAME

Post  palpet2005 on Sat Feb 04, 2012 5:56 pm

I believe there might be reasons as to why other guys see that they may nail down the bidder. I advise the concerned to consult (Brela if in Tanzania) and have a lawyer to confirm and verify
that this was a matter of spelling error and the two reflect to one, unless otherwise there exist another typical different bidder with such a name KASAMBALA DISTRICT COUNCIL.

palpet2005

Posts : 1
Join date : 2012-02-04
Age : 42
Location : Dar es Salaam

View user profile

Back to top Go down

BID SECURITY

Post  GadielCM on Wed Dec 01, 2010 3:48 pm

RJM,
The evaluation commitee should use Rg 90 (10)/GN No.97 of 2005 of the PPA 2004 to reach consensus.

GadielCM

Posts : 69
Join date : 2009-08-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

BID SECURITY

Post  RJM on Fri Nov 26, 2010 12:58 pm

Recently I was contacted by friend of mine who is a practitioner in the procurement industry. He is working in the Procuring Entity known as KASAMBALA DISTRICT COUNCIL. The Procuring Entity advertised tenders for Supplying of Motor Vehicles. In the evaluation process it was observed that one of the bidder M/s MANENOMENGI addressed his bid security to the District Executive Director, KASAMBALU DISTRICT COUNCIL. There was disagreement between the members of evaluation committee on the valid of the bid security because the name of the district is KASAMBALA while the bidder has addressed his bid security to KASAMBALU. I was asked if this bid security can be accepted. I think it worth to share to help this chap. What is your take on this?

RJM

Posts : 256
Join date : 2009-07-30
Age : 66
Location : What is written without effort is in general read without pleasure

View user profile

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum